Legal Opinion
Chaplin v. Harbison Group (In Re Friedberg)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1990No. Bankruptcy No. 87 B 10819 (CB), Adv. No. 87-6030APublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to appeal an order of the bankruptcy court striking plaintiff’s jury trial demand in the above-captioned adversary proceeding. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are essentially set forth in the bankruptcy court’s opinion, see 106 B.R. 50 (S.D.N.Y.Bankr.1989), and are, except where noted, undisputed. This adversary proceeding arises out of a real estate contract between the Chaplin Group (“Chaplin”) and the Harbison Group (“Har-bison”), a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Freight System, Inc. v. W.A. Walker & Associates, Inc. (In Re American Freight System, Inc.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Glen Eagle Square, Inc. v. Meehan-Weinmann, Inc. (In Re Glen Eagle Square, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Finley (In Re Washington Manufacturing Co.)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1991
- Chaplin v. Harbison Group (In Re Friedberg)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Internal Revenue Service v. Ernst & Young, Inc. (In re Ernst & Young, Inc.)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991