Legal Opinion
Chaplin v. Harbison Group (In Re Friedberg)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 30, 1991No. 90 Civ. 6933 (RJW)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal of an order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Blackshear, B.J.) which granted appellees’ motion to strike appellant’s jury demand in this adversary proceeding. 1 Plaintiff/Appellant Alec H. Chaplin, as Agent for the Chaplin Group (“Chaplin”) seeks reversal of the bankruptcy court’s order, arguing that Chaplin is entitled to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment. Defendants/Appellees The Harbison Group (“THG”), Richard H. Friedberg (“Friedberg”), and Roger N. Greene (“Greene”) urge…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hassett v. Bancohio National Bank (In Re CIS Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Walter v. Freeway Foods, Inc. (In Re Freeway Foods of Greensboro, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary v. QLT, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Bennett v. Genoa Ag Center, Inc. (In Re Bennett)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1992
- Mendelsohn v. Lissauer (In Re Mindeco Corp.)District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.