Legal Opinion
Everett v. Harron
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 3, 1955No. Appeal, 233PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Hoeace Steen,
Defendants appeal from a decree of the court below enjoining them from refusing to admit plaintiffs, and others similarly situated, to an establishment known as “Boulevard Pools” and “Boulevard Swimming and Tennis Club.”
Defendants own and operate an establishment situate at Roosevelt Boulevard and Princeton Avenue in the City of Philadelphia. It covers about 7% acres and comprises four pools of various sizes and depths for swimming and bathing, a tennis court, a basketball court, a volley-ball court, ten ping-pong tables, swings for children, a large…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Valle v. StengelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Alto-Reste Park Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Browning v. Slenderella Systems of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Tire Jockey Service, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Bravo Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.