Valle v. Stengel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The complaint in the instant case originally consisted of twenty-six counts and is unnecessarily long and prolix. Jurisdiction is based on R.S. Sections 1977, 1978, and 1979, §§ 41, 42 and 43 of Title 8 U.S.C.A.,1 and on Section 41(12) of Title 28 U.S.C.A.2 The plaintiffs allege that they were denied rights guaranteed to them by the Fourteenth Amendment and by Article IV, Section 2, clause 1, or the Constitution of the United States. In count 26 the plaintiffs seek an injunction restraining the defendants from denying to the plaintiffs or any of them rights guaranteed them…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Glenn R. Mahone and Harvey L. Mahone v. David S. Waddle, Albert B. Ellway, Jr. And the City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Henry Howell v. CataldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.