Legal Opinion
In Re Hawaiian & Guamanian Cabotage Antitrust Litigation
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 18, 2009No. 08-md-1972 TSZPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER NO. 5: Dismissal With Leave to Amend
THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendants’ joint motion, docket no. 86, to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint, docket no. 69 (the “Consolidated Complaint”), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). The Court has reviewed all papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion and has considered the oral arguments of counsel presented on July 29, 2009. Hav ing previously taken the matter under advisement, the Court now enters the following Order.
Background
Plaintiffs, purchasers of shipping services between…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Blood Reagents Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Rivera-Muñiz v. Horizon Lines Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Carlin v. DAIRY AMERICA, INC.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.