Legal Opinion
In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 18, 2013No. MDL No. 2328PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL DIRECT-PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CASES
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
All of the defendants move to dismiss the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ claims of a per se illegal horizontal conspiracy and fraudulent concealment.1 Defendants Pool Corporation, SCP Distributors LLC, and Superior Pool Products (collectively “Pool”) jointly filed one motion, and manufacturer defendants Hayward Industries, Inc., Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc., and Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc. (collectively “Manufacturer Defendants”) jointly filed a second motion. For the following…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alford v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
- N. Am. Soccer League, LLC v. U.S. Soccer Fed'n, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Academy of Allergy & Asthma in Primary Care v. Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Amc Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Amc Entertainment, Inc., and American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Ipic-Gold Class Entertainment, LLC and Ipic Texas, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2022
- B R F H H Shreveport L L C v. Willis-Knighton Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.