Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Donald Wayne Dalton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2016No. CR-16-0012-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE PELANDER,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 Under Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 18.5(h), when a trial court permits the mid-deliberation substitution of a juror, the court must instruct all jurors, including the alternate, “to begin deliberations anew.” When, as here, a defendant does not object to a trial court’s failure to give that instruction and is then convicted, the defendant must establish on appeal that the omission constituted fundamental error. Because defendant Donald Wayne Dalton has not shown prejudice from the trial court’s failure to give the “deliberate-anew”…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Erick Antonio EscalanteArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Garcia v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  3. Jose Angel Renteria-Garcia v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API