Daniel A. Hill, Jr. v. Attorney General of the United States, and United States Board of Parole, Washington, D. C.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel A. Hill, Jr., proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Hill challenges the sufficiency of the United States Parole Board’s statement of reasons for denying him parole; he also urges that the Board’s guidelines for parole, as applied to him, frustrate the intent of the judge who sentenced him.

On July 19, 1973, approximately ten weeks after he entered the federal penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 1 Hill was afforded an initial parole hearing before examiners of the United States Parole Board (now…