Legal Opinion

United States v. Bazzano

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 21, 1977No. Nos. 76-2584 to 76-2588 and 76-2628PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal from judgments of conviction of six defendants raises two principal issues: (1) whether the district court erred in failing to grant a new trial because of prosecutorial misconduct in allowing the grand jury testimony of Government witness Moody to be read to Government witness Stanizzo and the grand jury testimony of Stanizzo to be read to Moody prior to trial, and (2) whether defendant Bazzano was denied the right to effective assistance of counsel with regard to sentencing because the district court failed to disclose published…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. Herbert BaylinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Bobbie Stanford, Louis Watson, Janice Davis, Estella Patterson, Doris Beverly, Dorothy Fife, Richard O'rourke, and Dorothy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Marshall v. LansingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. BazzanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Harry SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API