United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Richerson v. Dennis Wolff, Warden, Sheridan Institution, and the Illinois Parole and Pardon Board
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.
The questions raised by this appeal are whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that state prisoners be given reasons for the denial of parole release and whether 111. Rev.Stats. ch. 38, § 1003-3-5(c) provides adequate reasons.
I
Upon being granted leave to file his petition in forma pauperis, the petitioner, Charles Richerson, filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on January 6, 1975. In his pro se “Argument to Support Habeas Corpus Petition,” petitioner argued that he was denied parole because the granting of parole “would deprecate…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States ex rel. Johnson v. Chairman of New York State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Franklin v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Larry Charbert Hayes v. Dan Walker, Governor of the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States of America Ex Rel. William Scott v. Illinois Parole and Pardon Board and Lou BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.