Becker v. Stineman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J., pro tem.
This is an action for damages arising out of the sale of 8,500 shares of the capital stock of Coast Amusements, Inc., under circumstances more particularly described in this and in the companion case of Coast Amusements, Inc., v. F. L. Stineman (Civil No. 860), post, p. 746 [2 Pac. (2d) 447]), this day decided.
Respondent and appellants entered into a written agreement to operate a place of amusement at the Ocean Park Pier in Santa Monica. Appellants furnished certain .materials, labor and cash. Subsequently they incorporated, each subscribing for certain shares of stock…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Michell v. Grass Valley Gold Mines Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Hemmeon v. Amalgamated Copper Mines Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Klinker v. Guarantee Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Coast Amusements, Inc. v. StinemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Randall v. California Land Buyers SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Herkner v. RubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Columbia Engineering Co. v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Frankish v. Federal Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Marshall v. LaBoiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.