Legal Opinion

Herkner v. Rubin

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1932No. Docket No. 8206PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to recover the sum of $3,000 upon an agreement for the purchase of certain preferred capital stock of Lubin Inc., a corporation.

The corporation became insolvent, and certain of its creditors procured judgment against it, upon which executions issued. These were returned wholly unsatisfied, and the claims were subsequently assigned to plaintiff, who is also a judgment creditor.

The subscription agreement reads as follows:

“March 24, 1926.
“I agree to take $3,000 worth of pref. stock paying 6 per cent dividend in the J. Lubin Stores Inc., as explained by J. Lubin. It is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Miller v. California Roofing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Bourke v. FriskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Duntley v. KagariseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API