Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1999No. WD 51906PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*611ON MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE

SPINDEN, Judge.

William Taylor asks us to recall our mandate and to vacate our opinion in State v. Taylor, 943 S.W.2d 675 (Mo.App.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 695, 139 L.Ed.2d 640 (1998). He contends that his attorney, Willard Bunch, had a conflict of interest while representing him. The state concedes that Bunch had an actual conflict of interest and agrees that we should recall our mandate. We grant Taylor’s request.

A jury found Taylor guilty of killing his wife and convicted him of first degree murder. The circuit court sentenced Taylor to a life…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Yoakum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. HurtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. OnateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. GriddineMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Hutton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Barnett v. RoperDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API