Legal Opinion

United States v. Proctor Co

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 14, 1914No. 1120PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 31245 (T. D. 33160).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

They were entered at the value of 209 pounds 9 shillings. The appraiser added, to make market value, 66 pounds 7 shillings and 8 pence, and imposed additional duty under subsection 7 of section 28 of the tariff act of 1909. The entry value agreed with the invoice value. There was no appeal to reappraisement from the appraiser’s action in adding to make market value, *45but the importers appealed upon the ground that the mistake occurred through a clerical error. The facts tending to show the so-called clerical error are that the goods were entered for Mr. Bradley W. Palmer through the appellees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. Swedish Produce Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Hoeninghaus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Bush & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Yamada v. StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Kurz & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Balbach Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  5. Consmiller v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API