Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Braatz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 26, 1993No. 93-2076PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Joseph Mullen, Trace Mullen and Steve Feldt (Mullen) appeal a judgment dismissing their complaint against Ronald Braatz. Braatz moves to dismiss the appeal, contending that we are without jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Braatz contends that he mailed a notice of entry of judgment, thus shortening the time for filing a notice of appeal to forty-five days. He argues that it is immaterial whether Mullen actually received it because service is complete upon mailing.

We conclude that the presumption that mail sent is received is rebuttable. Therefore, service is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Reeves v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Carolene Products Co. v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Freed v. Plastic Packaging Materials, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Flores v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance v. GolkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Milton Arrowhead MountainSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. In Re WrightUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1995
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance v. GolkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API