State Ex Rel. Flores v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This case is before this court upon certification from the court of appeals pursuant to sec. (Rule) 809.61, Stats., of a petition for writ of habeas corpus, claiming ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.
The following two questions were certified:(1) Is it ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for an appointed attorney to close a file without informing the defendant of the option of a no merit report?(2) If so, should such a rule be imposed prospectively only?
*601The first certified question posed by the court of appeals is actually two separate questions in practice: (1) was the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BallietteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SanchezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. Debra A. E.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.