Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Flores v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1994No. 92-2114-WPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This case is before this court upon certification from the court of appeals pursuant to sec. (Rule) 809.61, Stats., of a petition for writ of habeas corpus, claiming ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

The following two questions were certified:(1) Is it ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for an appointed attorney to close a file without informing the defendant of the option of a no merit report?(2) If so, should such a rule be imposed prospectively only?

*601The first certified question posed by the court of appeals is actually two separate questions in practice: (1) was the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BallietteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. SanchezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. Debra A. E.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API