Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1991No. 89-16717PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

In this action filed pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., John Jordan appeals the district court’s judgment after a jury trial. Although the district court entered a judgment in Jordan’s favor based on a verdict against both Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. (“Santa Fe”), and Leaseway Company and Lightning Warehouse, Inc. (“Leaseway”), Jordan contends that a number of errors by the district court led the jury to render a significantly reduced damage award. The principal contention is that the district court erred in giving an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louis A. Maurer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. SAIF Corp./Oregon Ship v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Fidel A. Parra v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Finch v. Hercules Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
  2. Daniels v. Northcoast Anesthesia Providers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Clifton v. Voyager Inc.High Court of American Samoa · 1995
  4. Daniels v. Northcoast Anesthesia Providers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Faford v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API