Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Northcoast Anesthesia Providers, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 2018No. 105125PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MELODY J. STEWART, JUDGE
{¶ 1} As plaintiff-appellee Victoria Daniels was about to have surgery, the defendant-appellant-anesthesiologists Zoard Vasarhelyi, M.D. and Rostyslav Koziy, M.D., approved the placement of a transdermal patch on her to prevent postoperative nausea. Daniels appeared to have an allergic reaction to the patch and went into anaphylactic shock. She stopped breathing and experienced low blood oxygen for close to 30 minutes, causing her to suffer brain damage. Alleging that the active ingredient in the transdermal patch was part of the same family of drugs to which she had…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daniels v. Northcoast Anesthesia Providers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018