Legal Opinion
SAIF Corp./Oregon Ship v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1990No. 89-70412PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
This is a petition to review a decision of the Benefits Review Board in favor of the claimant in a Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”) proceeding. The claimant was unquestionably exposed to asbestos in 1942 while constructing ships for petitioner Oregon Shipbuilding Corporation (“Oregon”). The exposure occurred while he worked on a ship building way. Saif Corporation (“Saif”), also a petitioner here, is Oregon’s workers’ compensation carrier. The asbestosis was manifest in 1980 when it disabled the claimant, and the Board awarded the claimant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sokha Sun v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert Coleman, District Director of InsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- El Rescate Legal Services, Inc. v. Executive Office of Immigration ReviewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Clouser v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Clouser v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- El Rescate Legal Services, Inc. v. Executive Office Of Immigration ReviewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.