Legal Opinion

State v. Pelican

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 23, 1993No. 91-355PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Allen, CJ.

Defendant Terrance L. Pelican appeals his voluntary manslaughter conviction, claiming several errors in the court’s instructions to the jury. Defendant contends that (1) the court erroneously instructed that the evidence of diminished capacity could defeat proof of malice only, (2) the court erroneously directed the jury to convict defendant if the jury rejected the self-defense theory, (3) the self-defense instruction was incomplete because it did not adequately present the self-defense theory of the case to the jury, (4) the court erroneously directed the jury on how to reconcile…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. WheelockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. State v. UnwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. State v. BilladoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. State v. ValleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. State v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API