Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 7, 1984No. 10834PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, C. J.
After a jury trial, the defendant, John Smith, was convicted of the crimes of burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103 and criminal impersonation in violation of General Statutes § 53a-130. Each charge was based on a separate information. The defendant now brings a combined appeal from the judgments, claiming the trial court *215erred: (1) in its instructions to the jury on the burglary charge; and (2) in its denial of the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal of criminal impersonation because of insufficient evidence.1 We find no error in the trial court’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.