Legal Opinion
River Farms, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 14, 1967No. Civ. 8590PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.
This proceeding in prohibition was brought to restrain the Superior Court of San Bernardino County from proceeding further in a quiet title action, the subject matter of which is alleged in the petition to be in the State of Arizona.
Petitioner (River Farms, Inc.), an Arizona corporation, is a defendant in the quiet title action.
The real parties in interest are Erwin P. Werner and Marjorie A. Werner (Werner), plaintiffs in the quiet title action.
The original complaint in the quiet title action filed July 6, 1966 alleged that certain described real property is in the County of San Bernardino,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Poole v. Lessee of FleegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Cheshire National Bank v. JaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Coffee v. GrooverSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Dean and Martha Lowe v. Joseph C. and Joyce A. RichardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1989