Legal Opinion

United States v. Portt

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 17, 1986No. 49683/AF; ACM S26161PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted, by a military judge sitting alone as a special court-martial, of possession, distribution, use, and introduction of marihuana, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. His sentence to confinement at hard labor for 4 months, forfeiture of $350 pay per month for 2 months, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge was approved by the convening authority. The supervisory authority disapproved the finding of guilty as to the introduction offense, modified the findings…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. ReisterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  4. United States v. MunizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API