Legal Opinion
City of Orlando v. Murphy
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1938No. 8488, 8489PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
After the reversal of his judgment, 1 plaintiff Murphy sought, by tendered amendments, to carry on the litigation in the reversed cause upon new pleadings; the defendant City sought, by motion in that cause, to have the costs taxed in its favor. Leave to file the amendment to further litigate was on January 4, 1937 denied, upon the ground that our reversing decision and opinion, “definitely and finally decided that under the contract in question, damages for delay and anticipated profits could not be recovered,” whereupon, on February 14, 1937, final judgment was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Canter v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Wells Brothers Co. of NY v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1966
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. John R. Clark and J. R. Clark CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Partridge v. PresleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Albuquerque Broadcasting Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.