Legal Opinion
Gray v. City of Santa Fe
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 31, 1937No. 1474PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Gray, Godbe, Vasconcells and Lucken-bach, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought this action against the City of Santa Fe to recover damages for breach of contract. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint. Plantiffs elected not to plead further and an order was entered dismissing the action.
Plaintiffs in the first cause of action of their complaint, after setting out the requisite jurisdictional facts, alleged these facts :
On August 15, 1922, the City duly adopted Ordinance No. 401. It confirmed prior proceedings taken in providing for the improvement of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Weston v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Peake v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Ready v. Mayor of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- City of Alton v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. District Court of McKinley CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- United States v. Raymond Love, A/K/A Mr. Love and Mr. LauCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Altman v. KilburnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Dwyer v. Le Flore CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Crist v. Town of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.