Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Marion Equipment Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1995No. 4205PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This ease requires us to determine whether an indemnity clause in a lease agreement obligates Marion Equipment Company (Marion) to indemnify Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aetna) for its expenses in defending and settling a suit against the Howard S. Wright Construction Company (Wright). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Marion. We conclude that the indemnity sought by Aetna is prohibited by AS 45.45.900 and therefore affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This case arises out of an injury sustained by James Crane, a journeyman…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brockman v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Norman McMunn v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation, Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Eichleay Corporation, Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. City of Dillingham v. CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Fort Wayne Cablevision v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United Rentals Northwest, Inc. v. Yearout Mechanical, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Christensen v. NCH Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gossman v. Greatland Directional Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API