Legal Opinion

Gossman v. Greatland Directional Drilling, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1999No. S-8310PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In April 1995 Timothy Gossman was injured while working at a storage facility formerly owned by Greatland Directional Drilling, Inc. Gossman sued Greatland for negligence. Greatland, however, had voluntarily dissolved as a corporation in 1993. The superior court dismissed the action, ruling that AS 10.06.678 only permitted a suit against a dissolved corporation when the liability arose prior to dissolution. Because we conclude that AS 10.06.678 permits a suit against a dissolved corporation for an action that accrues following dissolution, we reverse.

II.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wien Air Alaska v. ArantAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Chadwick v. Air Reduction CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  5. University of Alaska v. TumeoAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. J.M.R. v. S.T.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Gerber v. Juneau Bartlett Memorial HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Societe Financial, LLC d/b/a Alaska ATM, and James Dainis, individually v. MJ Corporation d/b/a Shell and 15th GrillAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API