Legal Opinion

City of Dillingham v. CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1994No. S-5230PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on a petition for review filed by the City of Dilling-ham (City). At issue are the concepts of limited liability and indemnification, and the interpretation of AS 45.45.900.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In February 1981, the City solicited proposals from engineering firms to prepare a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Facility Plan related to the City’s sewage treatment system. CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc. (CH2M Hill) submitted a proposal and was selected by the City.

In October 1985, CH2M Hill prepared a proposed Agreement…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Floor Craft Floor Covering, Inc. v. Parma Community General Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In Re the Proceeding Under AS 22.30.070(c) in Relation to JohnstoneAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. 1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API