Legal Opinion

Cordell v. Stroud

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 6, 1984No. 5706-2-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Mr. and Mrs. Norris Stroud appeal an award of damages under the Consumer Protection Act; Mr. Cordell and Mr. Weber cross-appeal on the issue of damages. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Mr. and Mrs. Stroud are licensed real estate broker and agent, respectively, and operate a real estate business, United Farm Agency, Inc., on 10 acres adjacent to the Wenatchee/Chelan highway. In February 1980, the Strouds entered into a lease with an option to purchase from Donna Wilson. After the agreement expired on July 31, 1981, the Strouds and Ms. Wilson agreed orally to continue on a month-to-month…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Brazil v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HarkeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Cordell v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API