Legal Opinion

Cordell v. Stroud

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 6, 1984No. 5706-2-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

38 Wn. App. 861 (1984)

690 P.2d 1195

WAYNE G. CORDELL, ET AL, Respondents,

v.

NORRIS N. STROUD, ET AL, Appellants.

No. 5706-2-III.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

November 6, 1984.

Michael R. Tabler, for appellants.

S. Gay Cordell and Scott & Cordell, for respondents.

THOMPSON, J.

Mr. and Mrs. Norris Stroud appeal an award of damages under the Consumer Protection Act; Mr. Cordell and Mr. Weber cross-appeal on the issue of damages. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Mr. and Mrs. Stroud are licensed real estate broker and agent, respectively, and operate a real estate business,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API