Legal Opinion

Eastlake Construction Co. v. Hess

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1984No. 49191-7PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Both parties to a construction contract appeal the Court of Appeals decision which increased the trial court's award of damages and affirmed the dismissal of an action under the Consumer Protection Act.

Two substantial issues are presented in this appeal. The first requires us to determine the proper measure of the owners' damages for breach of a construction contract resulting in both remediable and irremediable defects in the structure. We hold that the appropriate formulation of damages is that set forth in Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 348 (1981). Accordingly, we affirm several items…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Keyes v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Diedrick v. School District No. 81Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Smith v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Micro Enhancement v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Boeing Co. v. RooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API