Legal Opinion

Waterford Twp. Police v. Mattel, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 24, 2018No. LA 17–cv–04732 VAP (KSx)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff is the lead plaintiff in this putative securities class action on behalf of purchasers of Mattel's publicly traded securities between October 20, 2016 and April 20, 2017 (the "Class Period"). (Id. at ¶ 1). He alleges that he purchased Mattel securities at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period and suffered damages as a result. (Id. at ¶ 14).

Sinclair was Mattel's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") until February 2017, when he resigned as CEO and became Executive Chairman of Mattel's Board of Directors. (Id. at ¶ 16; see also, Doc. No. 56-14).

Dickson is, and was at all…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re SentinelOne, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  2. Kampe v. Volta Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  3. Kipling v. Flex Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Shanghai Liyu Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. v. Brite Lite Tribe LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
  5. Shanghai Liyu Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. v. Brite Lite Tribe LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API