Legal Opinion
Mattson v. Farrell Distributing Corp.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided July 17, 2001No. 2:00-cv-00243PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Barton Mattson (“Mattson”) brings this action under the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and its civil enforcement provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1132, alleging that his former employer, Defendant Farrell Distributing Corporation (“Farrell”), did not notify him of his right to continue his health insurance coverage as required by the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”). Farrell moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), asserting that the claim is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Gutierrez v. Premium Auto Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Harvey v. Mingo Logan Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
- Treanor v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Zurich Versicherungs Gesellschaft AG v. China Eastern Airlines Co. Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024