Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Mingo Logan Coal Co.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided August 5, 2003No. CIV.A. 2:02-1177PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GOODWIN, District Judge.
Pending before the court are: (1) the motion of the plaintiff, Nathan B. Harvey, for leave to file a second amended complaint [Docket 27] and (2) the motion of the defendant, Mingo Logan Coal Company (Mingo), for partial summary judgment [Docket 34], Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 15(a) permits amendment of a complaint after a responsive pleading has been filed “only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.” The court finds that the interests of justice are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jerome SANDBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KPMG PEAT MARWICK, LLP, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Wilt v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Myers v. King's Daughters ClinicDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Gutierrez v. Premium Auto Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Treanor v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Harvey v. Mingo Logan Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Melanie Stroud v. Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2026