Legal Opinion

Hickok v. Cowperthwait

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Frank M. Hickok, as receiver, etc., from a judgment of tlie Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Kings on the 15th day of March, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

This action is brought to set aside as fraudulent as against judgment creditors certain transfers of stock of the Brooklyn Chair Company and the Brooklyn Factory and Power Company, which had been made by Frank H. Cowperthwait to his son Frederick S. Cowperthwait. On the trial the defendant Frank H. Cowperthwait was *618called as a witness for the plaintiff, and his testimony then given and his testimony taken in proceedings supplementary to execution under the judgments above referred to comprised all of the testimony offered by the plaintiff relating to such transfer. At the close of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coleman v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Kain v. . LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Starin v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Billings v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Young v. . HeermansNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Berlenbach v. BischoffNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hickok v. CowperthwaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. A.B. Medical Services, PLLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
  4. Voorhees v. UngerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Berkner v. RubinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API