Hickok v. Cowperthwait
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Frank M. Hickok, as receiver, etc., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the .defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 15th day of March, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term. .
1Opinion of the Court
Jenks, J.:
This plaintiff brought two actions for fraud against the Cowperthwaits. The actions were tried together, and the records are identical. In one action a certain corporation, was made a party defendant and in this action the respondent Aymar. The-appeals in these actions are separate. Our judgment in the action first heard on appeal, written by Burr, J. (Hickok v. Cowperthwait, 134 App. Div. 617), disposes of all of the questions as to the transactions of the defendants Oowperthwait, and, therefore, as tó them this judgment is reversed. We have then but to consider this appeal as to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- First National Bank of Paterson v. National Broadway BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- White & Williams v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Hickok v. CowperthwaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hickok v. . CowperthwaitNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- First National Bank v. BradshawNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
- Helburn-Thompson Co. v. All Americas Mercantile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Hickok v. CowperthwaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Hickock v. CowperthwaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.