Legal Opinion

Berlenbach v. Bischoff

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The judgment debtor’s conveyance to her daughter and the judgment obtained by the debtor’s son-in-law (husband of the daughter referred to) against her upon her confession are attacked. The court finds there was no consideration for the note upon which the judgment is based and that the judgment is fraudulent and was confessed to defeat the claim of the plaintiff. The conveyance had a consideration, an antecedent indebtedness, but it was made for the purpose of defeating plaintiff’s claim. This finding is required by the evidence. The legal question then is whether the conveyance is valid or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. . LeopoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Hickok v. . CowperthwaitNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Hickok v. CowperthwaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Charles T. Streeter Construction Co. v. KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Emmi v. PataneNew York Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. McCombsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. UNITED STATES v. McCOMBSCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. LefrakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. United States v. Orozco-PradaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  5. Brown v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In Re Foxmeyer Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API