Legal Opinion

Gross v. Creyts

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1902No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Assumpsit by John G. Gross against John Oreyts for work and labor. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff recovered the value of work and materials furnished in plumbing the house of defendant. Defendant brings error.

The work was performed under a written contract. Defendant contended that the worki had not been performed in accordance with the terms of the contract, and denies any obligation to pay for the same, on any terms. The jury found, in answer to special questions, that plaintiff did not complete the plumbing according to contract; but as the plaintiff’s claim was for $156, and a jury awarded a verdict for $150.46, the deficiencies were manifestly not relatively very great.

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. McKibbinMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Martus v. HouckMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Sheldon v. LeahyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Grand Lodge of Iowa Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. De Graw v. Supreme Court, I. O. F.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Scott v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ginsberg v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Falk v. NitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API