Legal Opinion

Goodsell v. Seeley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Macomb. Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The defendant in error, an infant, brought suit against Goodsell, who is a physician, for malpractice in setting her arm. Goodsell had treated the injury as a fracture of the humerus, but after two or three weeks it was discovered that there was a dislocation at the elbow, and another physician was called in, by whom the dislocation was properly treated. There was a fair question on the evidence whether Goodsell had been laboring under any mistake in his treatment; whether the fracture for which he treated the child had not existed in fact, and whether the child had not caused the dislocation…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Krzewinski v. Robert Gage Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ginsberg v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kethledge v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Winston v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API