Goodsell v. Seeley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Macomb. Case. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The defendant in error, an infant, brought suit against Goodsell, who is a physician, for malpractice in setting her arm. Goodsell had treated the injury as a fracture of the humerus, but after two or three weeks it was discovered that there was a dislocation at the elbow, and another physician was called in, by whom the dislocation was properly treated. There was a fair question on the evidence whether Goodsell had been laboring under any mistake in his treatment; whether the fracture for which he treated the child had not existed in fact, and whether the child had not caused the dislocation…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Krzewinski v. Robert Gage Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Ginsberg v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Kethledge v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Winston v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.