Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Dennis M.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1969No. Sac. 7819PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Dennis M., a juvenile, appeals from a judgment declaring him to be a ward of the court and committing him to the Youth Authority. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 725, 800.) He contends that the record is • insufficient to support a finding that he was guilty of involuntary manslaughter, and that his confession was introduced into evidence in violation of the rules laid down in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 *448[16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974], We have concluded that the points are not well taken and the judgment should be affirmed.

At the time the events in issue took place,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API