Legal Opinion

In re Linehan

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1887No. 20281PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

— The petitioner, John Linehan, was convicted in the Police Judge’s Court of the city and county of San Francisco, upon a complaint charging him with keeping more than-two cows within certain limits in said city and county, in violation of order No. 1587 of the board of supervisors of said city and county, as amended by order No. 1705. A fine was imposed upon defendant, and in default of payment thereof he was adjudged to be imprisoned, etc. He appealed to the Superior Court, where the judgment was affirmed, and upon the return of the remittitur he was committed in default of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte Smith & KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Ex parte ShraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Johnson v. SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Ex parte CasinelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ex parte HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Boyd v. City of Sierra MadreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. City of St. Louis v. FischerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Mitchell v. City of RoswellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Grumbach v. LelandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API