Legal Opinion

Bolt v. Norfolk Southern Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 31, 1997No. 2:97CV805PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MORGAN, District Judge.

Procedural History

Plaintiff George David Bolt (“Bolt”) filed a complaint on August 8, 1996. He then filed an Amended Complaint on September 4, 1996. Originally, Bolt’s Amended Complaint contained five counts. Each count was asserted against both Norfolk Southern Corporation (“Norfolk Southern”) and Kenneth E. Williams (“Williams”). Count 1 alleges quid pro quo sexual harassment in violation of Title VII. Count 2 alleges hostile environment sexual harassment in violation of Title VII. Count 3 alleges a state common law assault and battery claim. Count 4…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. Silver Spring Volunteer Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  2. Folkes v. New York College of Osteopathic Medicine of New York Institute of TechnologyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  3. Davenport v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  4. Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
  5. Bolinsky v. Carter MacHinery Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API