Legal Opinion

Garza v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided April 28, 2020No. 8:18-cv-00391Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PAUL GARZA, Plaintiff, 8:18CV391 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. Paul Garza is suing his former employer, Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR), under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA)

45 U.S.C. § 51

et seq., alleging his workplace exposure to hazardous materials caused or contributed to the development of colorectal cancer. (Filing No. 1 at CM/ECF p. 2). Garza had a mass of “malignant appearance” removed during a colonoscopy on August 6, 2015 and was informed of his diagnosis on August…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
Quinn v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
David J. Fries v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
In Re: Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company Sales Practices Litigation. Jack McCord Daniel Martin Frances Martin, Individually and as Representatives of All Persons Similarly Situated v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.