Legal Opinion

David J. Fries v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 10, 1990No. 89-1985PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff David J. Fries appeals from the district court’s judgment granting defendant Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Company’s (C & NW) motion to dismiss on grounds that the statute of limitations had run on his action brought under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

Appellant was employed by C & NW as a machinist from April 10, 1969 to September 15, 1987. In 1980 or 1981 Fries first noticed a decline in his hearing and he began experiencing tinnitus in either 1981 or 1982. Although both Fries and his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Gary C. Lancaster v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. National Fidelity Life Insurance Co. v. Joan KaraganisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Cloer v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Rodriguez-AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. Ronald Sweatt v. Union Pacific Railroad CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Robert Campbell v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Robert C. Aparicio v. Norfolk & Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API