Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 2, 2005No. 98-896CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiffs moved for reconsideration of the September 16, 2004 Order entering summary judgment for the Government pursuant to the Federal Circuit’s Mandate. They argue that (1) neither this court nor the Federal Circuit has ruled on their holiday pay claim; that (2) neither court has addressed all their arguments on the overtime pay claim; and that (3) they are entitled to offer new theories of recoveiy because the Circuit “departed from established precedent.”
The Federal Circuit did not rule directly on the holiday pay issue, but the Circuit’s ruling on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Laitram Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Nec Corporation and Nec Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Engel Industries, Inc. v. The Lockformer Company, Iowa Precision Industries, Inc., and Met-Coil Systems Corporation, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Carlsen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006