Legal Opinion
Segal Brokerage Co. v. Lloyd L. Hughes, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1938No. 8643PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The appeal is from an order of the District Court approving the report of a special master rejecting claims of appellant for administrative expenses against appellee Lloyd L. Hughes, Inc., in proceedings for reorganization under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207 and note.
The petition for allowance set up two claims. One of these was based upon commissions said to have been earned by ap*209pellant under a brokerage contract for the sale of hops. The other claim is for the reasonable value of services alleged to have been rendered in negotiating a settlement…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sams v. Olympia Holding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
- Fuller v. Bradley Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Dermody v. New Jersey Realties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Peak v. JurgensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lesser v. W.B. McGerry Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- E.B. Harper & Company, Incorporated v. Nortek, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Ross v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corp. v. One Parcel of Land in District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
- Springs and Davenport, Inc. v. Aag, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009