Legal Opinion

Springs and Davenport, Inc. v. Aag, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 13, 2009No. 4588Published

1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.

AAG, Inc. (AAG) appeals from the master-in-equity’s order awarding Springs & Davenport, Inc., d/b/a H.B. Springs, Co., (Springs) $75,000 in commissions for the sale of property, arguing the master erred in finding: (1) the commission agreement was not a modification of the original listing contract; (2) the commission agreement did not create a condition precedent to payment of the commission; (3) Springs’s interest in the property did not terminate with the foreclosure sale; and (4) the sale of the property to Clark Homes was not the result of intervening events or any of Springs’s actions.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Thomas-McCain, Inc. v. SiterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Hamrick v. Cooper River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  5. Ballenger Corp. v. City of Columbia, SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API