Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Ann Arbor Transportation Authority

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 4, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-CV-15207PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING FURTHER PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this First Amendment case, Plaintiff Blaine Coleman challenges the bus advertising policy of Defendant Ann Arbor Transportation Authority (AATA) and the rejection, under that policy, of his proposed ad, which is critical of Israel. He filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order (Dkt. 3), arguing that the policy—which required that ads be “in good taste” and not likely to subject any “group of persons” to “scorn or ridicule”—was unconstitutional.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Am. Freedom Defense Initiative v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Women's Health Link, Inc. v. Fort Wayne Public Transportation Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Women's Health Link, Inc. v. Fort Wayne Public Transportation Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API