Legal Opinion
Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 28, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1839PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Baylson, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION...570
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND...570
A. Initial Proposed CIR Advertisement...570
B. SEPTA's Rejection of the Proposed Ad...573
C. Revised Advertisement and Second Rejection...574
III. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND...574
IV. EVIDENCE...575
A. Preliminary Injunction Evidence...575
B. Benedetti's Trial Testimony...575
*5691. Impact of AFDI Litigation...575
2. SEPTA's Application of Standards, Including the Challenged Provisions....576
3. Interpretation of the Challenged Provisions...577
4. Digital Displays/News Feeds...578
5. Asserted Inconsistencies in Benedetti's…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Center for Investigative Repor v. SEPTACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020