Paric Corp. v. Murphy

CRANE, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, Michael P. Murphy, filed an amended counterclaim against Paric Corporation (Paric) requesting delivery of certain documents relating to Paric’s profit-sharing plan (Count I) and recovery of benefits under the profit-sharmg plan (Count II). The trial court dismissed Count I and entered judgment m favor of Paric on Count II because Murphy failed to provide the consent and *287election forms necessary to receive benefits prior to age sixty-five in a form other than a Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity (QJSA). It ordered each party to pay its own costs and…